Her Hiney the UnaBlogger is taking potshots at the concession stand on the beach, Weekend at Bernie's. Her motivations about this became clear when she announced her involvement with a new restaurant at the corner of Erie and Schooley called the Fire Hosebag's Grill. She said Bernie's is not safe and that it hasn't been inspected by the health department since last year. In reality, the date of the last inspection was May 28, 2010 and it passed with no issues. You can find out yourself from Niagara Info Dine -- just google it. Anyway the Hosebag's Grill has NEVER been inspected.
Maybe they didn't get around to it yet, but then the moron blogger said she was laid up with the flu for a week that kept the place from opening. Hmmm. Flu is many times confused with food poisoning. The sooner Typhoid Sharon's restaurant finds its grave, the sooner the council candidate with the Greek recipes can open his campaign office.
WTF America???!??!?!?!?
-
Ok, this IS going to sound Anti-American, but it's not. Not exactly. I love
a number of American citizens, and I'm sure they're not this warped.
I just hav...
34 comments:
Hmmmm, The corner of Erie and Schooley Roads. What a great spot for a campaign office!??! Locals don't venture to the Beach, just a bunch of sun-bathers from out of town that sign bogus petitions! lol. I guess Martha Lockwood is still the front runner if she decides to run for council again. I think we should call the Health department, I bet they would like to inspect this "busy" eatery! lol
In as much as the unablogger harrassed Martha Lockwood for having a friend that ownwed a business at Bay Beach and required her to declare a conflict of interest, would the same requirement not be applicable to a candidate who is actually a part owner in the same area?
Blogger The Editor said...
It is amazing that, because I run a blog that doesn't agree with the way this town is being run, that there are a few people who would put down our efforts to open a business and possibly employ a few people. We are all working very hard to make this place special and up to the highest standards. We have encountered unexpected delays and we are anxious to be able to serve our full menu. Even with the experience I have, there were some surprises, but I'm not really worried. It will all work out. (fingers crossed.)
June 18, 2010 10:20 AM
And this was submitted but not posted shortly after:
It is not because you run a blog that is critical of the town. It is because you are an asshole who has used your blog to run down and discredit people who have nothing to do with the town and who have only tried to do what you are doing with your restaurant, make a living. The identities of these people will become known to you sooner than you think, but later than you like and in a way that will make you shit your pants.
I have received a fair number of posts from people who have been censored and I've been holding on to them to give El Turdo a chance to post them. They are reasonable and not insulting. The only reason I suspect she won't post them is because they are reasonable and not insulting but are against her point of view. She wants to prove a point that the people who oppose her are boorish and personally insulting and not reasonable and intelligent.
And THAT has been the trademark of the Strand blog since it's inception.
At first under the previous format, posts went up as soon as they were submitted. Those that the Editor didn't agree with got deleted.
Then she went this new format where posts have to be approved by her. Any that oppose her opinion or offer truthful explanations or tend to deflate her obsession with hate for all around her get rejected.
She did infact accept my post arguing my having been called a loser. You have to admit, the post was not offensive and even conceded that to call a person a loser for their opinion is unwarranted. But that post was quickly rebuttled, but that is that poster's opinion and I accept that.
That post referenced a previous post that was not accepted. It read: " Ummmm .... why would I look for a job when I already have one.
And I believe your comment about trashing people would be better directed towards the Editor.
She has been very proud to proclaim that she has been doing it since 2002.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear."
Take the Strand Blog for what it is ....... trash.
Hey .... want good, healthy, positive discussion about Fort Erie?
Visit and participate in Forterians Blog .... Pride of Fort Erie at : http://prideofforterie.blogspot.com
Forterian had/has a dream of making Fort erie the MOST Patriotic Canadian Town and oust Thorold for that title.
Canada day is only a couple of weeks away and we can do it !!!!
Buy and fly a Canadian flag PROUDLY .... and participate in Forterieans Blog and make our community better. Enough of this Nay Say ..... time for Yeah Say !!!!
Blogger the Editor wrote
"That is why people like you continue to send posts here and contribute comments to the slander blog - because you're scared. Why else?"
Because people don't agree with you -- and then you call them names, and you level invective at them, accuse them of crimes, you make their personal lives objects of your speculation, and their foibles subject to ridicule.
Because, Sharon Bowers, you are an asshole. You alienate people who might agree with you but they know about you and want to stay as far away as possible. You make all the little problems in your mind the problems of everyone else. You are a useless pile of shit and you just can't handle it when someone pushes back at you.
It behooves the UnaBlogger to quote the section of the Ontarians With Disabilities Act that exempts vehicles with handicapped stickers from paying municipal parking fees. Or is this just something she made up because there is no Ontario Disabilities Act?
Actually there is a Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
Quote from the site :"Even though the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 is now the law, the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2001 remains in force until it is repealed."
However, having search the site exhaustingly, I have found no reference reflecting that Disabled Ontarians are not required for paying for parking.
The site is:
http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/en/mcss/programs/accessibility/OntarioAccessibilityLaws/2001/index.aspx
Her poopy little fingers are busy googling, mark my words. When their not contaminating the food at the Fire Hosebag Grill.
I was sure she said the Ontario Disabilities Act.
As the Editor is on this totally rampant rant about the unjusticies served upon the persons with inabilities, I offer her the following challenge.
Editor .... as you have professed, the Corporation of the Town of Fort Erie, has injustly reacted to the means and requirements of those proclaiming to be of disability.
To you, the business to which you are associated, and to the stakeholders therein, I offer you to put your money where your mouth is. Not our taxpayer's money ..... but YOUR money.
I challenge you to, where every infirmed person who walks into your place of business, regardless of the number of patrons waiting in line, you move them to the front of the line.
Then prepare and serve them that of which they ordered, and tell them ..... "No Charge".
I dare you ..... I double dog dare you.
Put your money where your mouth is!!!
Hmmm if she has seating space and a parking lot then she is required to have handicap parking with proper markings and signage.
I cannot understand why the Editor refuses to accept my post and inquiry as to whether or not her new business has been inspected by the health department. And she complains about transparency and operating illegally.
I would think that any business would be required to be inspected prior to selling food.
We will know if and when an inspection occurs through the site:
infodine.yourniagara.ca/InfoDine.aspx
What is she hiding?
Possibly she hasn't been certified by the Regional Health Department.Every food handler in a restaurant is subject to receiving a certificate in completing a "Safe Food Handling Course". Anyone concerned should call the Regional Health Department at 905-871-3020. Until then good luck and be "Safe".
Here is another post rejected by Miss poopy pants...Your blog is stooping to another new low. A bogus "Notice of Seizure" posted on a BIA office and paraded by disgruntled, axed, former Board members. Just another example of cowardly deception by your army of misfits! A "Notice of Seizure" usually has an "official" letter head from a District Court. Take another picture "Hebsy"!... In the mean time your business is suffering. Karma is at play that's a for sure!!!
It is so easy to draw idiots out in this blog and others like it. Do you really believe that the BIA was delinquent in rent in the amount of $13,000.00? Or did the landlord mislead a couple of malcontents that took it to Bowels' Blog? How much could have the monthly rent have been to let it get this far? $1000.00? a month?, $5000.00 a month? It didn't look very big. Maybe 500 square feet of so. That would make Jarvis St. mirror downtown Toronto, wouldn't it? Let us say that the "landlord" is less than candid and me thinks that a couple of troubled X board members have conspired again to mislead anyone who care to listen! Perhaps, when they don't have thriving businesses they have to fill their days with mischief. How say you?
One more post not accepted by The Crystal Beach Strand...This "Notice of Seizure" is not displayed at the previous BIA office. I called the office and someone answered. Business as usual, from my impression. Apparently we have been deceived by someone not so honest with their assumptions. My guess is that the former landlord is not talking openly about this "seizure" either or else the papers would be all over it. Secondly, where are all the other BIA offices in town? Smells like those two "Bowers Disciples" are behind this "seizure" nonesense. Again, why were they tossed? This was taken from a legitimate news article. Check The Review archives for yourselves. "Council deemed these changes to the Bridgeburg BIA Board to be an opportunity to revitalize and rejuvinate the membership and provide new direction for the business improvement area". The articles also explain why others on the board left because of these two, including a member of the clergy. Apparently the board became more political and less business like. Hmmmmm.
What is the address of the alledged eviction? I have a couple of thing I want to check out.
Never mind ..... I see it is 22 Jarvis.
Please disregard previous post.
Again, by no surprise, another post rejected by "the strang blog". Apparently the BIA office manager is house bound because of a sprained ankle.Thus,the BIA phone number has been forwarded to her residence. It has also been approved by the board of management to continue operating "rent free" because of unforeseen "utility" expenditures brought upon by the previous landlord. Landlord/tenant issues? Only speculating....Call the news papers, I did. Let's read about it and get the "real" strory!
I see the Farthouse Grill still has their "Full Menu Coming Soon" up, just like everything else poop pants has done .... always coming soon .... never happens.
Think the only thing that is going to be on their menu is a big ol' plate of crow.
But remember, their are going to teach everybody else how to run a busuness and even write a book on it. And now she likes to call herself a " restaurant biz professional">
I see her buddy Phil Smith's restaurant has been cited with 4 infractions/ non-compliances over the past year, all sanitary issues. Great mentor EH?
Beware of "The Crystal Beach Strand"! The editor not only omits postings but traces them as well. Anonymous postings are not what they seem, apparently revealed by a former disgruntled employee of a "certain" computer source in town.
The recent "strand blog" issue is further testimony of deceit and obvious deception. The actors in this comedy of errors are easily exposed.
Two infamous business owners in Bridgeburg, a dillusional landlord that seems to be under the influence and a couple of cameos by a few pissed off "events volunteers".
It's literally impossible for a municipally governed association to be in arrears in any shape or form. Upon receit of monthly rent owing is processed quite prudently by any municipality. Unless said landlord has an axe to grind with said municipality in other issues such as delinquency in property tax payments in the past??
Ask any present BIA Board Member and it becomes pretty clear that sufficient notice was given, rent was received upon receipt, a cost saving measure has taken place to get back on budget because of unforeseen cost overruns(hydro), and lasty, notice was given to all businesses in the membership.
Maybe a little bottom spanking is in order for all of Sharon Bowers actors? Oh by the by, I didn't try to post this on "The Crystal Beach Strand". Good Day!
To add a couple more tidbits of information to the BIA issue, as a "curious sort". A couple of business owners on Jarvis St. a few weeks ago, apparently witnessed the BIA office move. Boxes, Office desks,filing cabinets,tables,chairs, etc. were moved one morning in broad day light. These same business owners also noticed a "Notice of Seizure" previous to the move. Rumour has it that the landlord seized the office furniture, computer and office files illegally and had to return them to the rightful owners. Word has it that the rent was paid until the end of the month of May but the seizure notice was witnessed on the 28th of May. It was taken down immediately after the police were called in to search for the missing items. It doesn't take long to get to the bottom of this issue, just ask anyone on Jarvis St. You'll find all the answers you're looking for. As to the "bogus story", look no figure but the past history of the BIA board members that were removed sooo reluctantly. Even got their ugly mugs on the front page of The Review a couple of years ago!... Just keeps things on the up and up, sorry conspiracy theorists!
I take MUCH community pride and exhilerating not to answer the questions posted by you Sharon Bowers regarding OUR COMMUNITY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1. Yes, the Fort Erie Race Track is still viable. Absolutely .... as per the ongoing efforts of all involved, the long history of the Fort Erie Race Track will be enhanced and grow. And the stabilitity of all those employed through it's efforts are secured. Thanks to the efforts of Jim Thibert, whom you constantly slander and desicrate.
2. Does Martha Lockwood really thinks she'll get re-elected? I think probably she does and will, because, I suspect, she pays no attention to your one sided and vicious blog and fake newspaper.
3.Is the Bridgeburg BIA even relevant anymore? ...... Sharon Bowers .... you disgust me. You take any tidbit of misinformation and blow it all up. The question should be if the Crystal Beach BIA will survive with YOUR involvement. Maybe you can talk them into a $1000 loan to which you write off as a gift, and not repay. Maybe you can teach them how to skip out in the middle of the night with the aide of a town councillor and stiff the landowner with rent owing!!!!
4. What's wrong with the Friendship Festival? .... NOT A DAMN THING !!!! Sure they wen't through some tought times, but still ..... to this day .... they put out an outstanding festival to promote the Friendship shared to with their friends to the south. Too bad the Americans have, after 2 years of the inception of the Festival, having realized that the Canadians appreciated the concept of the Festival more than they, let their side droop to nothing more that a cotton candy vendor, and a clown blowing balloons.
5. Well, it is reassuring to know that the Editor is so knowledgable, and has the "inside connections" to know that there is a " myriad problems at the NRP?" This statement I write off a a complete figment of the Editors twisted mind. And to suggest this of our Police Force, is the most distaststeful, arrogant comment made by the Editor to date. ( A link to the STRANDS accusations HAS been sent to the NRPD )
6. Quote, the Editor: " Just a tiny handful of people are in favour of
the Molinaro Project. Meanwhile visitors to the
area cannot believe that the town administration
is so stupid as to push for the high rise."
You can survey your 2 customers per day at the Firehouse Grill all you want and should they conceive Fort Erie/ Crystal Beach as a pleasant place to be, we all take comfort in the fact that you will tell tham that it is a horrid place and we want no part of them. Great business sense. Thanks for that ..... Sharon Bowers. You have already stated, and proven that every visitor to Crystal beach that you have talked to, you have trashed the community. Good luck on your business .....LOL.
Well Editor ..... you have just spelled it out yourself. Your political attittudes have surpassed your business sense. Here, on Canada Day, as on your bogos newspaper, which you now promote as " the best place on Earth: Canada " , and have for years preceding trashed everything WE stand for as CANADIANS.
From your statement, are we to understand that CANADA is a better place than the United States of America ...... 'cause that's what you said .... EH?
This post will be submitted to 2 blogs.
Justifying their failures in life, be it in business, political aspirations, social acceptance or lack of enjoyable family life is what fuels Bowers and her flock of misfits.
They find pleasure in mocking others that are successful in any shape or form. To be successful in anything you must strive to be better than average, genuine and honest with your own convictions.
Unfortunately these few sad sacks that invoke theories of wrong doing will never find happiness, even in their daily plotting to discredit those that try just a little harder to do right by others. What a way to live your lives! We can't wait to see what other "tall tales" you come up with!
An obviuos deception: Take a close look at "the crystal beach strand" recent blog photo and you'll see Mike Hepburn's head in the reflection. Photo journalist? Or conspiracy theorist? Apparently rumour has it that this "good guy" was tossed from the BIA because he tried to use the Association to help promote/sell his property along side of the International Bridge to the Ambassador Bridge group. Promoting a new "bridge" solely for monetary gain is a no-no! Especially if you're using tax payers money(BIA fund) to do so... Now he's speculating wrong doing by this new board. Really? Witnesses clearly saw "a seizure notice" then soon after, a move in broad daylight! Photo's also clearly show your motives Mikey! Spin this one Bowers. I bet the photo will disappear when Mikey gets wind of it! Very careless amateurs! Gotcha, LOL
I just checked out the strand blog. I can see someone in the picture and the notice is not official and very suspicious.It's all making sense now. A landlord that caused his own greif, an ex-board member of an association(photographer) with an axe to grind and Bowers at her finest or worst, depending on your point of view. The underlining story line here is about greed and deception that's for sure. Talk about diversions. What sad sacks!
So what you're telling us is that Heburn took the photo, sent it to Bowers, conspired with her, conspired with the landlord and spun this issue to make the BIA look bad? Hmmmmm, that explains the constant "tit for tat" blogging in the past week. At 7:40 am either the landlord or Hebs first comments on it, then someone tries to make heads or tails of it and a couple of naive readers jump all over it. What a bunch of idiots! Create a story, spread rumours about it then stand back and watch it play out. Wow, sad to be them. I wonder how their spouses cope with their lack of conscience? What a way to live! Always miserable and frustrated.
Raising speculations usually brings out the facts, when all is said and done the truth will come out. Thanks to Heburn for bringing it to our attention.... Although, what happens if he was just fooling us and he knew all along about the reasons for the BIA move? How about if he asked a board member about the dispute with the landlord and got the facts? How about if there is evidence to prove it? Maybe there are e-mails sent to him and the rest of the business owners and he still made it seem that he didn't receive any information? Records of received e=mails are easily kept, just as e-mails sent. Alot of question marks, no? This just might bite him in the ars if he's fibbing! Are you a fibber Mike Heburn? Oh by the way, you should have worn a hat and not your work shirt, the picture clearly reveals you. How about your intentions?
If and when the truth comes out in this episode of the BIA,Mike Hepburn will have to be implicated somehow. Hopefully for his sake the facts will pay out in his favour. If not, his credibility will be questioned once more.
Bowers still insists that thousands of tourists descend on Crystal Beach and "spend their money". Why is it that so many businesses have failed over the years? Even at the present site of her new restaurant, there have been several turnovers. Why is that? Maybe beach goers are not spending quite as much as it seems? Why would they leave the beach, cross the street, look for something to spend their money on when they can get the same hot dogs or pop right there? Why would they? Please tell us, Sharon. You seem so knowledgeable! How will you explain your failed venture in September? Will you blame us for not contributing? For the record, you and Pappadakis would be the last soles on earth to serve me!
Hebourn knows the truth, he is a liar...he has e-mails and his sad bunch of loser friends will get what they deserve when the truth comes out. The businesses on the street should be upset with the former landlord who is trying to steal money out of their pockets with his false claims. The BIA will not stand by and let this happen and they will not let the lies continue...
Poor Sharon! What happened to her story about the BIA? Not to anyones surprise she started a new story on the strand. Well not true. The same story. You know the same old song and dance. The condos and how they will destroy the "beach" and soooo many people are against it. Apparently 90% of the taxpayers would rather see Crystal Beach stay the same, according to her, Ann-Marie Noyes, Bob Steckley and Marcia "the summer resident" and of course the new tight ass on the case, John Hill.
A couple of nice days a year when a handful of businesses run out of things to sell? What if Sharon didn't really tell the truth and her freezers are still full of unsold food? What if she only bought a couple of weiners and buns and ate them herself, leaving Johnny hungry? Sold out? Really? Why should we start believing anything she writes now? She does have a track record! I think it's to the point that if she told us she had a cure for cancer we would rather die!!
Post a Comment