Sunday, June 29, 2008

Who is this kook?

This was posted to her blog, all comments are encouraged. I doubt you'll see it approved on hers. It was originally posted as a comment but I've put it up here. Canuck

Wow, I've refrained from posting to this fucktarded bleating blog for some time now, but lately the rhetoric has reached historic levels. I feel compelled to voice my opinion of it, even at the risk of the slim chance that someone might give this piece of net-turd some validity. Now, I know "The so-called Editor" will remove my post almost immediately, so I'll be posting to another blog that she can't "edit".

Now, I've been on the internet for quite some time and seen my share of idiotic net-kookery, but this so-called blog takes the cake. It's slanderous commentary, and twisting of reality indicates a deep seeded mental instability in "The so-called Editor". I mean, who is this kook? Does she work for the region? Does she even work? Or is she an immigrant with a weak (and quite fragile) claim on ODSP? I won't say that she has the mental abilities of a deer tick, because she can string words together (although her grammar leaves something to be desired), and post those words to a forum that is largely ignored by the masses. She does have other qualities of the deer tick though, burrowing, and sucking the life force out of anyone (myself included) that gets wind of her lies and grandstanding. I am sure Hillary's campaign is better off now that she was involved!

Now, why would I care you ask? I am wrestling with that question myself. Why would anyone care if an unemployed geriatric so called editor, blathers and rants with twisted facts and outright lies? Well I am pretty bored here on vacation in Iran, so I thought I'd stir the pot a little. I just don't understand how someone's "reliable sources" can be so unreliable, I mean, the conjecture here is just astounding.

Not only does the "so called editor" attempt to convince people that the council members are corrupt, thieves and all around incompetent, she also outright lies about what they say and do, and all this, in print. Simply amazing. I mean, claiming that one councillor was not somewhere, when in fact, she was, and many people saw her, is a sign that her mental instability and need for attention has reached critical mass. Also implying that hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer's money has "disappeared" just because she doesn't know where it went 38 years ago is borderline psychotic.

If she thinks speaking ill of the dead is bad, why does she have so much trouble refraining from it? Why does she constantly bash those living and dead, when she has no clue or substantiation of her claims? She never lied to Lorraine? Wow, that would be the only person that she was honest with. Of course she could always say that any inconsistencies in her facts were from her reliable sources right?

I do have a suggestion for you. The town councillors do not think that "we" are that stupid, it's just you. Do you wonder why you only got 1 comment on that post? No one cares what you think. Do they care that you plagiarize other media outlets? NO! Do they care that you are barely smart enough to rename your images so that no one can find out where you copied them from? NO! I think Ridgeway's charm problem only has one cure, please, stop breathing. Do us all a favour and use your talents to some constructive end. Why don't you run for office, your strong following on your blog should be enough to sway the vote your way. Question for you though, how many times have you posted in the comments section of your own blog, with an anonymous posting?

Now, there have been a very few occasions that you have had good ideas, but instead of using proper channels to funnel them through, gaining support for them with traditional methods, you choose to post them online, shrouding them in your kooky blog. This totally obliterates any real valid thought you have. I mean seriously, do you really believe that your are some sort of "investigative journalist" or or something? Real journalists use real methods and real sources, not gossip and conjecture. How many times have you said things, and not substantiated the claim at all. Every time someone does totally decimate your position, you conveniently delete the posting, then change the subject.

If you know what it takes to make this area a living thriving place, by all means, do what you need to do to accomplish this, but I will give you a hint, ranting on the net will not get you a seat on council.

8 comments:

Canuck said...

Blogger the Editor has the strange ability to be on the wrong side of everything. Are you undecided about an issue? Find out what she thinks and go the other way.

Anonymous said...

I'm sick and tired of being told what to do by Americans.

Anonymous said...

You were right. It wasn't posted.

Anonymous said...

of course it wasn't, the thread has even been commented on since.

Anonymous said...

Maybe Blogger the Editor will take the salient advice given and retreat to the backwoods somewhere. Like all conspiracy theorists, she can work on a manifesto that details her dilusional plan to bring down the Town of Fort Erie. Hopefully she will be joined by the other nutcases in this Town.

Canuck said...

and we'll now call her the UnaBlogger

Anonymous said...

I love it! Great alias. Sharon Bowers aka the Unablogger. All she's missing is the Kasinsky beard and moustache. On second thought, she has that covered as well.

Anonymous said...

I haven't had my comments unpublished but I have gotten the subject changed with help from some of her fellow carnies.

However I never took her site seriously. I thought it was meant for fun. I no longer post there.