Who is this kook?

This was posted to her blog, all comments are encouraged. I doubt you'll see it approved on hers. It was originally posted as a comment but I've put it up here. Canuck

Wow, I've refrained from posting to this fucktarded bleating blog for some time now, but lately the rhetoric has reached historic levels. I feel compelled to voice my opinion of it, even at the risk of the slim chance that someone might give this piece of net-turd some validity. Now, I know "The so-called Editor" will remove my post almost immediately, so I'll be posting to another blog that she can't "edit".

Now, I've been on the internet for quite some time and seen my share of idiotic net-kookery, but this so-called blog takes the cake. It's slanderous commentary, and twisting of reality indicates a deep seeded mental instability in "The so-called Editor". I mean, who is this kook? Does she work for the region? Does she even work? Or is she an immigrant with a weak (and quite fragile) claim on ODSP? I won't say that she has the mental abilities of a deer tick, because she can string words together (although her grammar leaves something to be desired), and post those words to a forum that is largely ignored by the masses. She does have other qualities of the deer tick though, burrowing, and sucking the life force out of anyone (myself included) that gets wind of her lies and grandstanding. I am sure Hillary's campaign is better off now that she was involved!

Now, why would I care you ask? I am wrestling with that question myself. Why would anyone care if an unemployed geriatric so called editor, blathers and rants with twisted facts and outright lies? Well I am pretty bored here on vacation in Iran, so I thought I'd stir the pot a little. I just don't understand how someone's "reliable sources" can be so unreliable, I mean, the conjecture here is just astounding.

Not only does the "so called editor" attempt to convince people that the council members are corrupt, thieves and all around incompetent, she also outright lies about what they say and do, and all this, in print. Simply amazing. I mean, claiming that one councillor was not somewhere, when in fact, she was, and many people saw her, is a sign that her mental instability and need for attention has reached critical mass. Also implying that hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer's money has "disappeared" just because she doesn't know where it went 38 years ago is borderline psychotic.

If she thinks speaking ill of the dead is bad, why does she have so much trouble refraining from it? Why does she constantly bash those living and dead, when she has no clue or substantiation of her claims? She never lied to Lorraine? Wow, that would be the only person that she was honest with. Of course she could always say that any inconsistencies in her facts were from her reliable sources right?

I do have a suggestion for you. The town councillors do not think that "we" are that stupid, it's just you. Do you wonder why you only got 1 comment on that post? No one cares what you think. Do they care that you plagiarize other media outlets? NO! Do they care that you are barely smart enough to rename your images so that no one can find out where you copied them from? NO! I think Ridgeway's charm problem only has one cure, please, stop breathing. Do us all a favour and use your talents to some constructive end. Why don't you run for office, your strong following on your blog should be enough to sway the vote your way. Question for you though, how many times have you posted in the comments section of your own blog, with an anonymous posting?

Now, there have been a very few occasions that you have had good ideas, but instead of using proper channels to funnel them through, gaining support for them with traditional methods, you choose to post them online, shrouding them in your kooky blog. This totally obliterates any real valid thought you have. I mean seriously, do you really believe that your are some sort of "investigative journalist" or or something? Real journalists use real methods and real sources, not gossip and conjecture. How many times have you said things, and not substantiated the claim at all. Every time someone does totally decimate your position, you conveniently delete the posting, then change the subject.

If you know what it takes to make this area a living thriving place, by all means, do what you need to do to accomplish this, but I will give you a hint, ranting on the net will not get you a seat on council.

The Serial Loser -- don't stare

People who have been subjected to Blogger the Editor's cyber harassment have been asking, "who is she?" We've been able to piece together some bits here and there from what she's written and from information submitted but not posted here including this picture. Apparently she was a columnist for the Niagara Falls Review in 1991 but got canned for reasons we can only guess at judging by her conduct lately...lying, exaggerating, insulting, threatening, using the column to fight her personal beefs, berating the editor, backstabbing, etc., etc. Apparently she tried to print a newspaper afterward but was not even able to give away advertising. Getting a copy of that would be really interesting.

The Case of the Serial Loser

One of Blogger the Editor's favorite words and she wrote that she likes to use a lot is "schadenfreude".

This speaks to her in such a perfect way. It means "pleasure derived from another person's misfortune". Isn't that special. She gets pleasure from other's misfortunes. Does it make her tingle in those tingly spots?

When there's no misfortune around, she likes to stir some up. Her problem is that she finds a great amount of pain in another's success. She shits on people who are successful and that causes her pain. It's the signature of a serial loser. A 63-year-old spinster with no accomplishements to call her own. She's learned to live on the Canadian welfare system, she's learned to steal from others...I guess those are accomplishements.

She feels a dire sense of alienation and she fulfills her own prophecy "I am alienated, therefore I will alienate myself, anyone who tries to help me will be bitten. See how alienated I am."

There will be nothing left when she's gone. It's all a cold vacuum. Her birthday is coming up in July, let's get her a present. Let's all be miserable for one day and make her feel better.

Supreme Court rules on "fair comment"

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled on the issue of "fair comment" in libel and defamation suits.

Read the story.

"An individual's reputation is not to be treated as regrettable but unavoidable roadkill on the highway of public controversy, but nor should an overly solicitous regard for personal reputation be permitted to 'chill' freewheeling debate on matters of public interest," Mr. Justice Ian Binnie said.

Generally it allows people, in this case a radio commentator, to express exaggerated opinions if there is an "honest belief" that the facts are true.

The legal tests the court set out to determine "honest belief" include:

The comment must be on a matter of public interest.

It must be based on fact.

Although it can include inferences of fact, the comment must be recognizable as comment.

It must be capable of satisfying the question: Could any person honestly express that opinion on the proved facts?

The fact remains that Blogger the Editor is a lying, mentally-ill, drug-addled douche bag.

If you look at that sentence, douche bag is the exaggerated opinion based on provable facts that she is a liar, has written extensively about being mentally ill and was "suitably medicated" in preparing to watch a TV broadcast of a town council meeting. She has made herself into a person of some minor public interest. Therefore, the comment is fair.

She must be stopped!

This was posted as a comment

Recently I have been attacked once again regarding my life style and my profession. I am so tired of her "chit" that I am very close to filing a claim against the one and only. I just do not understand her attacks on me and the rest of the CBIA board.We do not have a hidden adgenda.. we do not have time for that. We are doing nothing wrong. I am a licenced Paralegal and a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada . My # is P03030 and have had to write several exams , and pay my fee's and dues just like any other lawyer. I provide legal services to many.

I am sick and tired of her calling me the "so called or sometime paralegal"..

We need to stop this woman.

What about that lawsuit, Miss (ahem) Editor?

Blogger the Editor seems interested in an alleged lawsuit involving a property owner in Ridgeway. We'd be interested in the lawsuits against Blogger the Editor.

We also would like to see the "2 or 3 boxes" of evidence regarding the Bay Beach issue.

Blogger the Editor is going to be held to account in every way she (a non-citizen of Canada) holds others accountable whether they are our elected officials or private citizens.

Blogger the Editor has been allowed to perform her little shit dance, and it's a shitstorm she's going to get, even at the risk of giving her the validation she so obviously needs.

Please read the comment in the previous post and thanks for the writing assistance.

Do they think we're that stupid?!!!!

Who's they? Blogger the Editor suggests its town council. Judging by her posts about here favourtie son, it seems to me the real they is the lunatics she goes to group therapy with and the "we" are the hard-working honorable and community-minded citizens who make up the vast majority of this town. Did pudgy Tom Lewis really expect that he could wave a pile of newspapers and call them "studies"? That was one hell of a good bit of TV when Tim Witfield wanted him to show the world what was in the two boxes he carted into the council meeting. But we only got to see the contents of one, and the way he pulled them out of the box showed that he was trying to hide the fact that they were newspapers, whole newspapers, not clippings, not photocpies, but whole newspapers. What a moron. Does he care that he gets caught lying to the people like that? I don't think so. What did they teach that boy?